Figure 4: Roll dispenser for problem 6

Extra design-work apparently went into making these units
so that the paper would not roll off too freely! Question #6 asks you to
find the frictional torque caused by the pressure plates on the two sides
of the roll (double the torque of one), and balance it against the maximum
torque which can be produced by pulling on the paper without it tearing
at the perforations. As the roll gets smaller, the radius from the core
centre gets smaller, and the same maximum pulling force from the paper produces
less and less torque. Finally that pulling torque is not sufficient to overcome
the friction force, even when the pull is at it's greatest value -- the
tearing tension.
<--close-up of unit, showing leaf springs which press
against sides of paper core within the roll
The issue of doubling the resistance torque
because of having two friction surfaces doesn't depend on increasing the
force -- just the number of surfaces involved. My office chair has tilt-back
adjustments, which use a stack of interleaved plates, one set attached to
the back, and the other set bound to the base of the chair. A long spring-loaded
bolt passes through the stack, so that when the adjustment lever is flipped
up, all pressure on the stack is released, and the chair back can be moved;
when the lever is flipped down, the spring presses on the whole stack and
friction acting between the 18 meeting faces of the stack provides enough
friction to hold the chair back in the set position. Same principles as
your problem-set question #6.
Close-up
of friction plates used to bind tilting chair-back at any chosen position
