 When
 you ask physicists to reflect on their intro labs, responses include 
“boring”, “forgettable”, or “cookbook.”
 Enthusiastic responses usually come from students whose courses were 
non-traditional: they got to design their own experiments, build their 
own equipment, or choose their own topics. Across institutions, there 
has been little consensus on the goals and structures
 of lab courses with not much research to back up any position. Until 
now. In this talk, I will describe new research into the goals of lab 
courses, how we are measuring student progress towards those goals, and 
the efficacy of different approaches for achieving
 them. We’ll discuss some tactics for using intro labs to teach 
experimentation and critical thinking skills, some examples of labs, and
 some new research on different ways of implementing them.
  When
 you ask physicists to reflect on their intro labs, responses include 
“boring”, “forgettable”, or “cookbook.”
 Enthusiastic responses usually come from students whose courses were 
non-traditional: they got to design their own experiments, build their 
own equipment, or choose their own topics. Across institutions, there 
has been little consensus on the goals and structures
 of lab courses with not much research to back up any position. Until 
now. In this talk, I will describe new research into the goals of lab 
courses, how we are measuring student progress towards those goals, and 
the efficacy of different approaches for achieving
 them. We’ll discuss some tactics for using intro labs to teach 
experimentation and critical thinking skills, some examples of labs, and
 some new research on different ways of implementing them.