A supervisory committee will be appointed for each PhD candidate immediately upon his or her acceptance into the PhD program (or by the end of the first year, for direct-entry PhD). This committee will consist of the supervisor and two other Faculty members of the Graduate Department of Physics who are appointed upon the recommendation of the supervisor, in consultation with the student, and with the approval of the Associate Chair. It is recommended that the committee consist of one experimentalist and one theorist, and that, as far as possible, one should be in the same research field and the other in a related field. The supervisory committee is intended to monitor the student's progress and be available to provide guidance and assistance to the student. Informal meetings between the student and individual members of the committee are encouraged. However, both student and supervisor have the right to call a formal meeting at any time. The Associate Chair for Graduate Studies, or a faculty member whom he or she appoints, may attend any formal meeting of the supervisory committee. The first formal meeting of the supervisory committee will normally be at the PhD Qualifying Examination.
Annual PhD supervisory committee meeting
The PhD supervisory committee must meet with the student at least once a year to assess the student’s progress in the program, and to provide advice on future work. At least one week prior to the meeting, the student should distribute a written report, typically about 5 pages long, which gives an update on their thesis problem, the progress made to date, and future plans. At the meeting the student will present a 20-minute overview of the status of their research, with an emphasis on where the major problems and challenges lie. Once the student is beyond their 5th year of graduate studies, meetings of the supervisory committee can be held more frequently. For these meetings the student should include a statement an explicit time line for PhD completion, in addition to the usual report.
The committee will then help the student assess the nature of the problems encountered and suggest ways ahead. It will also assess the overall appropriateness of the research scope of the thesis. The committee submits a report detailing its observations of the student’s progress and its recommendations; the student may append a response if desired. If any member of the committee is unsatisfied with the situation then the report should reflect this. In the case of unsatisfactory progress, details must be provided and another supervisory meeting scheduled. Copies of the report are given to the student and filed with the Department. Further comments on responsibilities of the student, supervisor, and supervisory committee are given at https://uoft.me/Responsibilities .
MSc Oral Examination (Option II and III)
Within three terms of their initial enrolment, candidates for Option II of the MSc (without thesis) will be given an oral examination on the Research Project which they have been pursuing. The Examination Committee will consist of the supervisor and two Faculty assessors appointed by the Department, in consultation with the supervisor. The two Faculty assessors will provide two grades, one based on the written report of the Research Project (PHY3400Y), and the other on the oral presentation and defence of the Research Project (the 7000-series Seminar course). For Option III students, this examination will be held within 6 terms of initial enrolment.
PhD candidates must present themselves for examination within two terms of enrolment in the PhD program (or within five terms for direct entry students), or within five terms of enrolment in the School of Graduate Studies, whichever comes first. For students with a September enrolment, this is typically around April in the second academic year of graduate studies. The intention of the Qualifying Examination is to assess the candidate's ability and readiness to promptly carry forward and successfully complete independent PhD level research. This assessment will be based on the candidate's graduate record to date, including three full graduate lecture courses and the research performed, together with the presentation and defense of a research plan for the PhD thesis.
Students who have not completed their Qualifying Examination by the end of their third term in the PhD program will fall out of “good academic standing” and will not be eligible for scholarship support until they successfully complete the Examination. Students (and supervisors) should understand this means they will not be subject to the minimum funding guarantee for the time they are not in good academic standing. Making a first attempt before the end of the second term in the PhD program allows for a second attempt before the end of the third term. Between these two attempts the student remains in good standing and their support is subject to the minimum funding guarantee. It is the responsibility of the student to schedule the first attempt in a timely fashion, or risk losing financial support if they have not successfully completed the Qualifying Examination before the start of their fourth term in the PhD program.
The examination committee will normally consist of the three members of the supervisory committee and a Convener, who is a member of the Standards and Evaluations Committee who is not a member of the candidate's proposed supervisory committee. The student should provide each of the four members of the examination committee with a written outline of the proposed thesis project (about 5 pages or less), one week prior to the PhD Qualifying Examination.
One of the Convener's important duties is to ensure that departmental standards are maintained across the wide spectrum of disciplines in the Department. As a full member of the examining committee, the Convener will lead a discussion to assess that the candidate's academic and research performance to date, as determined by the grades obtained in four graduate lecture courses, the 6000 series Research course (if taken), and the MSc `Report' course (if taken). Members of the supervisory committee will comment on their perception of the candidate's ability to perform independent research at the PhD level and on the quality of the research carried out by the candidate
The candidate will then be asked to present, in approximately 20 minutes, a research plan that will lead to a PhD thesis. The examining committee will then question the candidate, who will be expected to explain and defend the research plan, to field questions on issues relating to the research, and to show the basic foundational knowledge needed in their research field. Finally, the Convener will lead a discussion to obtain a consensus on whether or not the candidate has presented a sufficiently realistic and well conceived program of research and has sufficiently demonstrated the academic ability, the required background preparation, the potential for independent research, and the scientific judgment to be permitted to continue in the PhD program.
The examination committee may permit or deny confirmation of the candidate in the PhD program. The committee may recommend one or more conditions (e.g. additional course requirements) that the candidate must fulfill before being allowed to continue. In the event of a denial, the candidate may be re-examined within four months of the date of the first examination. Upon a second unsuccessful result, PhD enrolment will be terminated.
Departmental PhD Oral Examination
Each candidate for the Ph.D. and their thesis will be examined at a Departmental Ph.D. Oral Examination upon receipt of a copy of the thesis. The examination committee normally consists of the supervisory committee, convened by the Associate Chair for Graduate Studies. As a full member of the examining committee, the Convenor will ensure that the candidate presents a lucid discussion of the thesis contribution in the time allocated (normally 20 minutes). The Convenor will, through questioning and by observing the response to questions from other committee members, confirm that the candidate can defend the work being presented and that the student has a sufficient mastery of the subject area and research area in general to reasonably expect the candidate to be successful at the Final Oral Examination. At the same time, the Convenor will ensure that the examination is conducted in a manner that is completely fair to the candidate. After the examination the Convenor will lead the discussion to obtain a consensus of the Committee as to whether or not the candidate may go forward to the Final Oral Examination of the School of Graduate Studies.
PhD Final Oral Examination (FOE) of the School of Graduate Studies
This examination is run under the auspices of the School of Graduate Studies by a committee which includes, besides members from the Department of Physics, one member from outside the University of Toronto, who provides an external appraisal of the thesis. The Final Oral Examination will be scheduled not sooner than eight weeks after the Department Ph.D. Oral Examination. This time cannot be reduced due to the time required to organize the meeting and the time required for the committee and the examiner to read the thesis. Students are strongly advised to allow for this time when planning their completion exercises. See "END GAME” – Summary Table for detailed information on the timeline for the submission of your dissertation and the FOE.
Reports and Theses
An archival document is departmental approved and made available in the University’s digital library repository where it becomes a matter of public record. Accordingly it must be written in a clear and comprehensible manner in acceptable scientific language, free of both major and minor errors, well organized, and professionally bound and presented. It should provide a complete and accurate record of the research which has been performed. All references and sources must be carefully and comprehensively listed, and full details of calculations, experimental procedures, and equipment should normally be included (often in appendices). Theses are generally archival documents, reports are not.
MSc Report (Option I)
The written account of an independent examination by candidates for Option I of an agreed minor research topic or literature survey carried out with the advice of a research supervisor. It is not expected to involve extensive calculations or the building of any new experimental equipment. It should be completed within three terms of full time graduate study in which three full lecture courses are also being taken. The report need not meet archival standards. It is considered to constitute the same workload as two full courses, with one full-course grade being given by the supervisor for the supporting research as the research course grade, and one full-course grade being given by an independent Faculty assessor for the M.Sc. report, which is listed as PHY3400Y on the candidate’s transcript. The format and length of the report are given below.
N.B.: For candidates who start their M.Sc. studies in September, the M.Sc. Report must be submitted to the Graduate Office before the end of the third week of the following August.
MSc Research Report (Option II)
Research carried out by candidates for Option II under the supervision of a faculty member resulting in a written report. The research should attack a significant scientific question, but need not involve extensive calculation or the construction of any new piece of experimental equipment. It should be capable of completion within three terms of full time graduate study where two courses are being taken simultaneously, and be brought to a point where the potential of the research is demonstrated and the candidate's ability to carry out independent research can be evaluated. The written report is not expected to meet archival standards. The format and length of the report are given below. The Research Project is considered to constitute the same workload as three full lecture courses. The grade for the Research course is given by the supervisor based on the student's work during the first two terms. Then, upon completion of the written report, the candidate will be given an oral examination by a committee consisting of the supervisor and two Faculty assessors appointed by the Department. The Faculty assessors will provide the remaining two grades at this examination: one based on the quality of the oral presentation and defence by the student of the Research Project (the appropriate ‘Seminar’ course) and the other based on the quality of the written report (PHY3400Y).
N.B.: For candidates who start their M.Sc. studies in September, the written report must be submitted electronically to the Graduate Office before the end of the third week of the following August, and the oral examination must be taken before the end of the second week in September.
MSc Research Thesis (Option III)
The written report of research carried out by candidates for Option III under the supervision of a faculty member. The thesis is to be of archival quality and should attack a scientific question of publishable significance. The investigation undertaken should be much less extensive than for a Ph.D. and need not be carried out in such an independent manner. It should be capable of completion within six terms of full time graduate study while two lecture courses are also being taken. It is considered to constitute the same work load as four full lecture courses. The format and length of the thesis are given below. The thesis will be assessed by the supervisor and two independent Faculty assessors assigned by the Department; the thesis may be accepted, accepted with minor changes, or rejected (see also MSc Oral Examination). The Research thesis is indicated on the student’s transcript by the indicator THS9999Y; no grade is assigned.
Direct-entry PhD: Progress report for year 1
At the end of their first year in the graduate program, direct-entry PhD students must submit a narrative about their progress towards establishing their thesis topic. This should include any research done to date, literature review, learning technical tools, and any results achieved so far. This should not be too detailed: year-1 progress reports are typically five pages. The report should be reviewed by your advisor before submitting to the graduate office. The intention is that it may provoke a useful discussion between the PhD student and their advisor, about progress to date and planning for the coming year.
The reports should be sent to firstname.lastname@example.org by August 31st of the summer of your first year. It should either be signed by your advisor (electronically or physically), or they should follow up with a "seen and approved" email to grad@physics. The report will not be graded, but it does document your progress towards the PhD.
The written report of original research carried out by the candidate in an independent manner, but under supervision as to quality and correctness. The research should result in one or more contributions to the scientific field of sufficient importance to be publishable in the scientific literature. The written thesis is to be of archival quality, and must represent the candidate's own work. The format and length of the thesis are given below. The thesis and the candidate will be examined at a Departmental Ph.D. Oral Examination, by a committee that will normally consist of the supervisory committee, convened by the Associate Chair for Graduate Studies. This committee will recommend whether or not the candidate should proceed to the Final Oral Examination.
Report and Thesis Formats
A PDF document must be created, with LaTeX or software at a similar professional standard. For both MSc reports and PhD theses, follow the font size, line spacing, margins, page sizes specified at
MSc reports, however, do not need to follow the "Page Order" or "Title Page" format of the PhD. Bibliographies should follow Physical Review formatting by default, or an equivalent standard from your field of study.
The limits on length for each degree option are as follows:
- M.Sc. report – Option I 6,000 words
- M.Sc. report – Option II 12,000 words
- M.Sc. thesis − Option III 25,000 words
- Ph.D. thesis 45,000 words
In all cases, size limits refer to the main body of the document, excluding prefaces, references, indexes, diagrams, tables, appendices and the like. However the document shall be examinable without reference to text other than that contained in the main body of the document. Reports or theses which exceed the limits above will not normally be accepted for examination. Explicit evidence of compliance with size limits will not normally be required, but will be requested by the Graduate Office as necessary.
Convocation and Graduation
Please see Convocation & Graduation Information provided by the Office of Convocation.